Analyse TWO approaches to health used in other OECD countries and describe how they could be used in Australia to improve health outcomes. Provide examples to support your answer. (8 marks)
--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Overview Statement
- Two OECD approaches – New Zealand’s Maori partnership model and UK’s sugar tax – demonstrate how targeted health interventions connect to improved wider population outcomes. These strategies reveal ways that Australia can address health inequities.
Cultural Partnerships
- New Zealand’s Maori health model influences health outcomes by embedding indigenous voices in healthcare decisions.
- This approach enables Maori communities to shape culturally appropriate services that result from genuine partnerships at all governance levels.
- The model depends on recognising distinct health needs and safeguarding cultural practices. Evidence shows this leads to improved health service utilisation among Maori populations.
- This pattern shows that empowering communities in healthcare design creates more effective, trusted services. In this way, Australia could strengthen ATSI health services with more meaningful community-control.
Economic Interventions and Behaviour Change
- The UK sugar tax affects consumption patterns by making unhealthy choices less affordable. This economic lever interacts with public health goals by simultaneously reducing sugar intake and generating revenue.
- The levy causes manufacturers to reformulate products while funding childhood obesity programs. This reveals how financial disincentives prevent harmful consumption.
- Consequently, Australia could implement similar taxes on unhealthy products, with revenue directed to health programs.
Implications and Synthesis
- These approaches work together as a holistic system – cultural responsiveness enables service access while economic measures prevent disease.
- The significance is that combining community empowerment with strategic taxation creates sustainable health improvements. In this way, Australia could address both health inequities and chronic disease through integrated policy approaches.
Show Worked Solution
Overview Statement
- Two OECD approaches – New Zealand’s Maori partnership model and UK’s sugar tax – demonstrate how targeted health interventions connect to improved wider population outcomes. These strategies reveal ways that Australia can address health inequities.
Cultural Partnerships
- New Zealand’s Maori health model influences health outcomes by embedding indigenous voices in healthcare decisions.
- This approach enables Maori communities to shape culturally appropriate services that result from genuine partnerships at all governance levels.
- The model depends on recognising distinct health needs and safeguarding cultural practices. Evidence shows this leads to improved health service utilisation among Maori populations.
- This pattern shows that empowering communities in healthcare design creates more effective, trusted services. In this way, Australia could strengthen ATSI health services with more meaningful community-control.
Economic Interventions and Behaviour Change
- The UK sugar tax affects consumption patterns by making unhealthy choices less affordable. This economic lever interacts with public health goals by simultaneously reducing sugar intake and generating revenue.
- The levy causes manufacturers to reformulate products while funding childhood obesity programs. This reveals how financial disincentives prevent harmful consumption.
- Consequently, Australia could implement similar taxes on unhealthy products, with revenue directed to health programs.
Implications and Synthesis
- These approaches work together as a holistic system – cultural responsiveness enables service access while economic measures prevent disease.
- The significance is that combining community empowerment with strategic taxation creates sustainable health improvements. In this way, Australia could address both health inequities and chronic disease through integrated policy approaches.