SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

  • Login
  • Get Help
  • About

HMS, HIC EQ-Bank 462

How do data collection challenges limit the Australian government's ability to effectively report on SDG progress?   (8 marks)

--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

*Recommended language to consider for “To What Extent” questions is bolded in the answer below.

Judgment Statement

  • Data collection challenges significantly limit Australia’s SDG reporting ability.
  • Evidence shows fragmented systems, missing indicators, and coordination barriers severely impact effectiveness.

Fragmented Data Systems

  • Evidence supporting this includes the fact that important data is scattered across multiple government departments with different collection methods.
  • States and territories maintain separate systems rather than unified approaches. This fragmentation means Australia cannot produce comprehensive SDG progress reports. For example, health data is collected differently in NSW versus Queensland which creates inconsistent national pictures.
  • The main factors supporting this include incompatible technology systems and varying departmental priorities.

Missing Measurement Frameworks

  • However, it is important to consider that some limitations are more severe than others.
  • Several SDG indicators have no accepted Australian measurement methods at all. This completely prevents reporting on certain goals regardless of coordination efforts.
  • Despite this, Australia remains one of the stronger performers compared to many nations because existing systems do provide partial data.
  • An alternative perspective to this issue suggests that while developing frameworks requires years of work, Australia is relatively well placed to create new measurement systems for collecting this data.
  • Nevertheless, current system shortcomings mean Australia cannot fully assess progress on all 17 SDGs.

Reaffirmation

  • Data challenges significantly constrain Australia’s SDG reporting capabilities.
  • Systemic differences in reporting between jurisdictions combine with missing indicators to create substantial barriers to reporting.
  • These limitations mean Australia cannot effectively demonstrate progress toward 2030 targets.
  • Implications suggest an urgent need for national coordination and standardised data systems.
Show Worked Solution

*Recommended language to consider for “To What Extent” questions is bolded in the answer below.

Judgment Statement

  • Data collection challenges significantly limit Australia’s SDG reporting ability.
  • Evidence shows fragmented systems, missing indicators, and coordination barriers severely impact effectiveness.

Fragmented Data Systems

  • Evidence supporting this includes the fact that important data is scattered across multiple government departments with different collection methods.
  • States and territories maintain separate systems rather than unified approaches. This fragmentation means Australia cannot produce comprehensive SDG progress reports. For example, health data is collected differently in NSW versus Queensland which creates inconsistent national pictures.
  • The main factors supporting this include incompatible technology systems and varying departmental priorities.

Missing Measurement Frameworks

  • However, it is important to consider that some limitations are more severe than others.
  • Several SDG indicators have no accepted Australian measurement methods at all. This completely prevents reporting on certain goals regardless of coordination efforts.
  • Despite this, Australia remains one of the stronger performers compared to many nations because existing systems do provide partial data.
  • An alternative perspective to this issue suggests that while developing frameworks requires years of work, Australia is relatively well placed to create new measurement systems for collecting this data.
  • Nevertheless, current system shortcomings mean Australia cannot fully assess progress on all 17 SDGs.

Reaffirmation

  • Data challenges significantly constrain Australia’s SDG reporting capabilities.
  • Systemic differences in reporting between jurisdictions combine with missing indicators to create substantial barriers to reporting.
  • These limitations mean Australia cannot effectively demonstrate progress toward 2030 targets.
  • Implications suggest an urgent need for national coordination and standardised data systems.

Filed Under: Improved health through SDGs Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, smc-5516-30-Australia's focus

HMS, HIC EQ-Bank 461

Outline the role of universities in implementing the SDGs in Australia.   (3 marks)

--- 7 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only
  • Provide knowledge and innovation to support SDG implementation through research expertise and evidence-based solutions for complex development challenges
  • Create future thinkers, leaders and implementers across all sectors both locally and internationally, developing human capital necessary for sustained progress
  • Integrate SDGs into undergraduate and post-graduate courses for widespread education, ensuring graduates understand sustainable development principles
  • Offer education for external sectors to provide knowledge and skills needed to address SDGs effectively in various industries and communities
Show Worked Solution
  • Provide knowledge and innovation to support SDG implementation through research expertise and evidence-based solutions for complex development challenges
  • Create future thinkers, leaders and implementers across all sectors both locally and internationally, developing human capital necessary for sustained progress
  • Integrate SDGs into undergraduate and post-graduate courses for widespread education, ensuring graduates understand sustainable development principles
  • Offer education for external sectors to provide knowledge and skills needed to address SDGs effectively in various industries and communities

Filed Under: Improved health through SDGs Tagged With: Band 4, smc-5516-30-Australia's focus

HMS, HIC EQ-Bank 454 MC

The 'We're All in this Together' initiative in the Illawarra region aims to address how many SDGs?

  1. 5 SDGs
  2. 6 SDGs
  3. 7 SDGs
  4. 8 SDGs
Show Answers Only

\(C\)

Show Worked Solution
  • C is correct: The initiative addresses SDGs 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12 and 17 (seven SDGs total).

Other Options:

  • A, B and D incorrect: All incorrect number of SDGs

Filed Under: Improved health through SDGs Tagged With: Band 2, smc-5516-30-Australia's focus

HMS, HIC EQ-Bank 453 MC

Which of the following best describes the Australian government's first step in implementing the SDGs?

  1. Creating new data collection systems for all 17 goals
  2. Establishing partnerships with international organisations
  3. Designing new policies for each individual SDG
  4. Working out what existing data matches or aligns with the SDGs
Show Answers Only

\(D\)

Show Worked Solution
  • D is correct: The document states the first step is determining what data already exists that matches or aligns with the SDGs.

Other Options:

  • A is incorrect: They use existing data first, rather than creating entirely new systems
  • B is incorrect: While partnerships are important, data alignment comes first
  • C is incorrect: Policy design comes after data assessment and alignment

Filed Under: Improved health through SDGs Tagged With: Band 3, smc-5516-30-Australia's focus

HMS, HIC EQ-Bank 447

Assess how effectively different sectors in Australia are collaborating to achieve the SDGs.   (8 marks)

--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Judgment Statement

  • Australian sectors demonstrate moderately successful collaboration in achieving SDGs.
  • This assessment is based on individual sector progress and the effectiveness of inter-sector coordination.

Individual Sector Progress

  • Government shows considerable commitment through policy integration and SDG alignment.
  • Evidence supporting this includes agencies incorporating SDGs into reporting despite data fragmentation challenges.
  • The business sector is demonstrating strong voluntary participation through workplace wellness programs.
  • Companies are also active in providing safe environments, living wages and reviewing their supply chains.
  • Universities achieve significant multiplier effects by training future SDG implementers.
  • Overall, collaboration within sectors is demonstrating high effectiveness in building long-term capacity to achieve SDG’s.

Inter-sector Coordination

  • Coordination between sectors shows limited effectiveness for integrated transformation.
  • Complex challenges require shared measurement frameworks that currently don’t exist.
  • Local initiatives like “We’re All in this Together” produce promising results. However, scaling these programs nationally faces major coordination barriers.
  • The results indicate weak accountability systems between sectors.
  • Different sectors find it much easier to address SDG’s in isolation rather than collaborative partnerships.
  • This minimal coordination impact prevents achieving transformative outcomes.

Overall Assessment

  • When all factors are considered, Australia shows moderate SDG collaboration success.
  • Individual sectors perform well independently but fail to integrate efforts effectively.
  • On balance, this proves sufficient for incremental progress but insufficient for transformation.
  • The assessment reveals urgent need for formal coordination mechanisms and shared accountability.
  • Implications suggest establishing national frameworks to connect sector initiatives for greater impact.
Show Worked Solution

Judgment Statement

  • Australian sectors demonstrate moderately successful collaboration in achieving SDGs.
  • This assessment is based on individual sector progress and the effectiveness of inter-sector coordination.

Individual Sector Progress

  • Government shows considerable commitment through policy integration and SDG alignment.
  • Evidence supporting this includes agencies incorporating SDGs into reporting despite data fragmentation challenges.
  • The business sector is demonstrating strong voluntary participation through workplace wellness programs.
  • Companies are also active in providing safe environments, living wages and reviewing their supply chains.
  • Universities achieve significant multiplier effects by training future SDG implementers.
  • Overall, collaboration within sectors is demonstrating high effectiveness in building long-term capacity to achieve SDG’s.

Inter-sector Coordination

  • Coordination between sectors shows limited effectiveness for integrated transformation.
  • Complex challenges require shared measurement frameworks that currently don’t exist.
  • Local initiatives like “We’re All in this Together” produce promising results. However, scaling these programs nationally faces major coordination barriers.
  • The results indicate weak accountability systems between sectors.
  • Different sectors find it much easier to address SDG’s in isolation rather than collaborative partnerships.
  • This minimal coordination impact prevents achieving transformative outcomes.

Overall Assessment

  • When all factors are considered, Australia shows moderate SDG collaboration success.
  • Individual sectors perform well independently but fail to integrate efforts effectively.
  • On balance, this proves sufficient for incremental progress but insufficient for transformation.
  • The assessment reveals urgent need for formal coordination mechanisms and shared accountability.
  • Implications suggest establishing national frameworks to connect sector initiatives for greater impact.

Filed Under: Improved health through SDGs Tagged With: Band 5, Band 6, smc-5516-30-Australia's focus

Copyright © 2014–2025 SmarterEd.com.au · Log in