*PEEL – Solution is structured using separate PEEL methods for each side of the argument; [P] Identify the point, [E] expand on the point with a link to question asked, [Ev] apply evidence/examples, [L] linking sentence back to question.

Concurrent feedback becomes more appropriate as skill level increases:

• [P] Autonomous athletes benefit most from concurrent feedback.
• [E] Expert performers can process information while moving because their basic skills are automatic.
• [Ev] Elite gymnasts adjust body position mid-routine when coaches call out corrections during practice.
• [L] Therefore, concurrent feedback suits advanced athletes who can multitask effectively.
   
• [P] Associative stage learners show moderate readiness for concurrent feedback.
• [E] These athletes have automated basic movements and can handle some real-time corrections.
• [Ev] Intermediate tennis players can adjust their swing path when coaches provide cues during rallies.
• [L] Thus, concurrent feedback becomes increasingly useful as skills develop.

Delayed feedback is more appropriate for beginners:

• [P] Cognitive stage learners need delayed feedback to avoid overload.
• [E] Beginners must focus completely on movement execution and cannot process additional information simultaneously.
• [Ev] Novice golfers should receive swing feedback after completing shots to maintain concentration on technique.
• [L] Therefore, delayed feedback prevents information overload in early learning.
   
• [P] Delayed feedback remains valuable for complex analysis at all stages.
• [E] Even experts benefit from post-performance review for strategic improvements.
• [Ev] Professional footballers analyse match footage days later to understand tactical patterns.
• [L] Thus, delayed feedback serves different purposes across all skill levels.