HMS, HAG EQ-Bank 33 MC

A fitness app claims to "scientifically track your wellness" but provides no details about the research behind its algorithms. When evaluating this health product, which question should be prioritised?

How much does the app cost compared to similar products?
What scientific evidence supports the app's health tracking claims?
How many downloads has the app received from users?
Does the app have an attractive and user-friendly interface design?

Show Answers Only

\(B\)

Show Worked Solution

B is correct: Scientific evidence validation essential for health product evaluation and safety.

Other Options:

A is incorrect: Cost comparison doesn’t address effectiveness or scientific validity.
C is incorrect: Download numbers indicate popularity, not accuracy of health claims.
D is incorrect: Interface design important for usability but not health effectiveness.