SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

  • Login
  • Get Help
  • About

HMS, HAG EQ-Bank 85 MC

The argument for increased prevention funding based on "containment of increasing costs" suggests that:

  1. Without prevention focus, healthcare costs could make adequate care unaffordable for ordinary Australians
  2. Prevention activities require expensive technological equipment to be effective
  3. Prevention programs generate revenue that can fund treatment services
  4. Private health insurance should cover all prevention costs to reduce government spending
Show Answers Only

\(A\)

Show Worked Solution
  • A is correct: Prevention is the best way of containing continually increasing healthcare costs that could become unaffordable.

Other Options:

  • B is incorrect: Prevention activities use existing accessible community structures not expensive technology.
  • C is incorrect: Prevention programs don’t generate revenue they save costs by preventing illness.
  • D is incorrect: The argument focuses on government investment in prevention not private insurance coverage.

Filed Under: Healthcare expenditure Tagged With: Band 4, smc-5482-10-Healthcare v prevention

Copyright © 2014–2025 SmarterEd.com.au ยท Log in