Analyse the relationship between motivational orientation and an athlete's response to success and failure in competitive situations. (6 marks)
--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
- Intrinsically motivated athletes typically respond to failure by analysing performance for improvement opportunities, maintaining engagement with the sport through focusing on process rather than outcome.
- Extrinsically motivated athletes often experience significant motivation decreases following failure, particularly when external rewards are performance-contingent rather than participation-based.
- Athletes with high task orientation view success through the lens of personal improvement and skill execution quality, enabling them to experience satisfaction even when competitive results are suboptimal.
- Those with strong ego orientation may devalue successes that don’t receive external recognition, potentially limiting their performance satisfaction and requiring escalating rewards to maintain motivation.
- Intrinsic motivation creates resilience following failure by generating alternative sources of satisfaction beyond competitive outcomes, exemplified by athletes who acknowledge technique improvements despite losing competitions.
- The attribution patterns following failure differ significantly between motivational orientations, with intrinsically motivated athletes more likely to attribute setbacks to controllable, specific factors that can be addressed through training adjustments.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
- Intrinsically motivated athletes typically respond to failure by analysing performance for improvement opportunities, maintaining engagement with the sport through focusing on process rather than outcome.
- Extrinsically motivated athletes often experience significant motivation decreases following failure, particularly when external rewards are performance-contingent rather than participation-based.
- Athletes with high task orientation view success through the lens of personal improvement and skill execution quality, enabling them to experience satisfaction even when competitive results are suboptimal.
- Those with strong ego orientation may devalue successes that don’t receive external recognition, potentially limiting their performance satisfaction and requiring escalating rewards to maintain motivation.
- Intrinsic motivation creates resilience following failure by generating alternative sources of satisfaction beyond competitive outcomes, exemplified by athletes who acknowledge technique improvements despite losing competitions.
- The attribution patterns following failure differ significantly between motivational orientations, with intrinsically motivated athletes more likely to attribute setbacks to controllable, specific factors that can be addressed through training adjustments.