Compare TWO different methods for collecting data on physiological responses during aerobic training. (5 marks)
--- 15 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
Similarities:
- Both methods aim to assess aerobic training responses by measuring physiological indicators during exercise sessions.
- Both require initial setup and preparation to ensure accurate data collection during aerobic training.
- Both provide information that can be used to evaluate training intensity and effectiveness.
Differences:
- A heart rate monitor provides continuous, objective measurement of heart rate throughout aerobic training sessions, giving precise data on cardiovascular responses.
- Observation method relies on visual assessment of breathing patterns, perceived exertion signs, and recovery indicators, providing subjective evaluation.
- Heart rate monitors offer real-time numerical data that can be recorded and analysed for patterns, making it easier to track adaptations.
- Observation method requires trained observers to identify physiological signs like breathing rate changes, skin colour, and fatigue indicators.
- Heart rate monitors provide consistent, standardised measurements that reduce human error and enable comparison across training sessions.
- Observation method allows assessment of multiple physiological indicators simultaneously but may lack precision in quantifying responses.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
Similarities:
- Both methods aim to assess aerobic training responses by measuring physiological indicators during exercise sessions.
- Both require initial setup and preparation to ensure accurate data collection during aerobic training.
- Both provide information that can be used to evaluate training intensity and effectiveness.
Differences:
- A heart rate monitor provides continuous, objective measurement of heart rate throughout aerobic training sessions, giving precise data on cardiovascular responses.
- Observation method relies on visual assessment of breathing patterns, perceived exertion signs, and recovery indicators, providing subjective evaluation.
- Heart rate monitors offer real-time numerical data that can be recorded and analysed for patterns, making it easier to track adaptations.
- Observation method requires trained observers to identify physiological signs like breathing rate changes, skin colour, and fatigue indicators.
- Heart rate monitors provide consistent, standardised measurements that reduce human error and enable comparison across training sessions.
- Observation method allows assessment of multiple physiological indicators simultaneously but may lack precision in quantifying responses.