Compare and contrast the use of health-related and skill-related fitness testing in the context of a secondary school physical education program. (5 marks)
--- 15 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
- Health-related component testing provides crucial baseline data about students’ overall physical wellbeing, whereas skill-related testing is more focused on athletic performance capabilities relevant to specific sports.
- Testing of health-related components such as cardiorespiratory endurance using the multi-stage fitness test can identify students at risk for cardiovascular health issues, while skill-related testing generally doesn’t provide health risk information.
- Skill-related component testing using assessments like the Illinois agility run can help direct students toward sports that match their natural abilities, which may increase participation and enjoyment compared to health-only assessment.
- Privacy considerations differ, with body composition testing using skin fold calipers requiring particularly sensitive handling to avoid negative body image impacts, whereas skill-related tests like reaction time typically carry less psychological risk.
- Health-related fitness testing results have lifelong relevance for students’ wellbeing beyond school, while the applicability of skill-related testing may be more limited to those who continue with athletic pursuits.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
- Health-related component testing provides crucial baseline data about students’ overall physical wellbeing, whereas skill-related testing is more focused on athletic performance capabilities relevant to specific sports.
- Testing of health-related components such as cardiorespiratory endurance using the multi-stage fitness test can identify students at risk for cardiovascular health issues, while skill-related testing generally doesn’t provide health risk information.
- Skill-related component testing using assessments like the Illinois agility run can help direct students toward sports that match their natural abilities, which may increase participation and enjoyment compared to health-only assessment.
- Privacy considerations differ, with body composition testing using skin fold calipers requiring particularly sensitive handling to avoid negative body image impacts, whereas skill-related tests like reaction time typically carry less psychological risk.
- Health-related fitness testing results have lifelong relevance for students’ wellbeing beyond school, while the applicability of skill-related testing may be more limited to those who continue with athletic pursuits.