SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

  • Login
  • Get Help
  • About

HMS, BM EQ-Bank 256

Analyse the benefits and limitations of implementing either continuous aerobic training or High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) as the primary training method for a cricket team during pre-season.   (8 marks)

--- 20 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Sample Answer

Continuous aerobic training benefits

  • Develops the aerobic capacity needed to maintain concentration and physical performance throughout a day’s play, particularly for fast bowlers and fielders who perform repeated efforts.
  • Establishes cardiovascular efficiency through adaptations including increased stroke volume and capillary density, enhancing oxygen delivery and facilitating quicker recovery between bowling spells or batting sessions.

Limitations

  • Insufficient development of the explosive power required for critical cricket actions like fast bowling, throwing from the boundary, or explosive batting strokes.
  • Lacks specificity for cricket’s intermittent nature, potentially leaving players underprepared for the varied intensity demands of competition across different formats (T20, ODI, Test).

HIIT benefits

  • Closer simulation of cricket’s intermittent intensity profile, particularly for shorter formats where high-intensity efforts are interspersed with recovery periods.
  • Simultaneously develops aerobic and anaerobic energy systems, improving players’ ability to perform repeated high-intensity efforts like consecutive boundaries when batting or maintaining bowling speed in later spells.
  • Improves lactate threshold and recovery between high-intensity efforts, crucial for maintaining performance quality in the closing stages of matches.

Limitations

  • Insufficient development of the extended aerobic foundation needed for longer format matches (Test cricket) if used exclusively.
  • Higher intensity creates greater neuromuscular and joint stress, potentially increasing injury risk for fast bowlers whose actions already place significant stress on the body.

Optimal pre-season approach

  • Periodising both methods – beginning with a greater emphasis on continuous aerobic training (70:30 ratio) to establish a foundation, then progressively shifting toward more cricket-specific HIIT sessions (30:70 ratio) as competition approaches.
Show Worked Solution

Sample Answer

Continuous aerobic training benefits

  • Develops the aerobic capacity needed to maintain concentration and physical performance throughout a day’s play, particularly for fast bowlers and fielders who perform repeated efforts.
  • Establishes cardiovascular efficiency through adaptations including increased stroke volume and capillary density, enhancing oxygen delivery and facilitating quicker recovery between bowling spells or batting sessions.

Limitations

  • Insufficient development of the explosive power required for critical cricket actions like fast bowling, throwing from the boundary, or explosive batting strokes.
  • Lacks specificity for cricket’s intermittent nature, potentially leaving players underprepared for the varied intensity demands of competition across different formats (T20, ODI, Test).

HIIT benefits

  • Closer simulation of cricket’s intermittent intensity profile, particularly for shorter formats where high-intensity efforts are interspersed with recovery periods.
  • Simultaneously develops aerobic and anaerobic energy systems, improving players’ ability to perform repeated high-intensity efforts like consecutive boundaries when batting or maintaining bowling speed in later spells.
  • Improves lactate threshold and recovery between high-intensity efforts, crucial for maintaining performance quality in the closing stages of matches.

Limitations

  • Insufficient development of the extended aerobic foundation needed for longer format matches (Test cricket) if used exclusively.
  • Higher intensity creates greater neuromuscular and joint stress, potentially increasing injury risk for fast bowlers whose actions already place significant stress on the body.

Optimal pre-season approach

  • Periodising both methods – beginning with a greater emphasis on continuous aerobic training (70:30 ratio) to establish a foundation, then progressively shifting toward more cricket-specific HIIT sessions (30:70 ratio) as competition approaches.

Filed Under: Aerobic vs Anaerobic training (EO-X) Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, smc-5530-20-Anaerobic v aerobic

Copyright © 2014–2025 SmarterEd.com.au · Log in