Evaluate how a coach can address differences in heredity characteristics when teaching a team sport. (8 marks)
--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
*Recommended words/phrases for “Evaluation” questions are highlighted in bold throughout the answer below.
Evaluation Statement
- Coaching strategies are highly effective when addressing heredity differences in team sports.
- This evaluation examines how well coaches match players to positions and adapt training to individual differences in team sports.
Position Allocation
- Placing players in positions that match their inherited traits strongly meets the goal of maximising team performance.
- Evidence supporting this includes basketball coaches placing taller players in rebounding roles while shorter, quick players excel at point guard. Further, players with natural speed advantages suit wing positions in rugby.
- A critical strength is maximising each player’s genetic advantages for team benefit. This approach achieves the best results by matching physical traits to position demands.
- Overwhelming evidence indicates that teams using heredity-based positioning show superior competitive outcomes.
Individualised Training
- Personalised training modifications adequately fulfil diverse athlete development needs.
- Athletes with different muscle fibre types require varied recovery periods between sessions. For example, fast-twitch dominant players need longer rest after sprints than slow-twitch athletes.
- While strong in preventing overtraining, this shows limitations when coaches lack genetic testing resources.
- Technique adjustments for different body types prove highly effective for skill development.
- Although effective for individual progress, it proves less suitable for maintaining team cohesion.
Final Evaluation
- Weighing these factors shows addressing heredity differences is highly valuable for team success.
- The effects on improved performance outweigh resource and cohesion challenges.
- The overall evaluation demonstrates coaches who embrace genetic diversity create stronger teams.
- Implications suggest that coaches need further investment in their training so they are more able to identify heredity differences to help all players reach their potential.
Show Worked Solution
*Recommended words/phrases for “Evaluation” questions are highlighted in bold throughout the answer below.
Evaluation Statement
- Coaching strategies are highly effective when addressing heredity differences in team sports.
- This evaluation examines how well coaches match players to positions and adapt training to individual differences in team sports.
Position Allocation
- Placing players in positions that match their inherited traits strongly meets the goal of maximising team performance.
- Evidence supporting this includes basketball coaches placing taller players in rebounding roles while shorter, quick players excel at point guard. Further, players with natural speed advantages suit wing positions in rugby.
- A critical strength is maximising each player’s genetic advantages for team benefit. This approach achieves the best results by matching physical traits to position demands.
- Overwhelming evidence indicates that teams using heredity-based positioning show superior competitive outcomes.
Individualised Training
- Personalised training modifications adequately fulfil diverse athlete development needs.
- Athletes with different muscle fibre types require varied recovery periods between sessions. For example, fast-twitch dominant players need longer rest after sprints than slow-twitch athletes.
- While strong in preventing overtraining, this shows limitations when coaches lack genetic testing resources.
- Technique adjustments for different body types prove highly effective for skill development.
- Although effective for individual progress, it proves less suitable for maintaining team cohesion.
Final Evaluation
- Weighing these factors shows addressing heredity differences is highly valuable for team success.
- The effects on improved performance outweigh resource and cohesion challenges.
- The overall evaluation demonstrates coaches who embrace genetic diversity create stronger teams.
- Implications suggest that coaches need further investment in their training so they are more able to identify heredity differences to help all players reach their potential.