Discuss how the appropriateness of concurrent versus delayed feedback changes as an athlete progresses from cognitive to autonomous stage in skill acquisition. Use specific sporting examples to support your response. (6 marks)
--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
*PEEL – Solution is structured using separate PEEL methods for each side of the argument; [P] Identify the point, [E] expand on the point with a link to question asked, [Ev] apply evidence/examples, [L] linking sentence back to question.
Concurrent feedback becomes more appropriate as skill level increases:
- [P] Autonomous athletes benefit most from concurrent feedback.
- [E] Expert performers can process information while moving because their basic skills are automatic.
- [Ev] Elite gymnasts adjust body position mid-routine when coaches call out corrections during practice.
- [L] Therefore, concurrent feedback suits advanced athletes who can multitask effectively.
- [P] Associative stage learners show moderate readiness for concurrent feedback.
- [E] These athletes have automated basic movements and can handle some real-time corrections.
- [Ev] Intermediate tennis players can adjust their swing path when coaches provide cues during rallies.
- [L] Thus, concurrent feedback becomes increasingly useful as skills develop.
Delayed feedback is more appropriate for beginners:
- [P] Cognitive stage learners need delayed feedback to avoid overload.
- [E] Beginners must focus completely on movement execution and cannot process additional information simultaneously.
- [Ev] Novice golfers should receive swing feedback after completing shots to maintain concentration on technique.
- [L] Therefore, delayed feedback prevents information overload in early learning.
- [P] Delayed feedback remains valuable for complex analysis at all stages.
- [E] Even experts benefit from post-performance review for strategic improvements.
- [Ev] Professional footballers analyse match footage days later to understand tactical patterns.
- [L] Thus, delayed feedback serves different purposes across all skill levels.
*PEEL – Solution is structured using separate PEEL methods for each side of the argument; [P] Identify the point, [E] expand on the point with a link to question asked, [Ev] apply evidence/examples, [L] linking sentence back to question.
Concurrent feedback becomes more appropriate as skill level increases:
- [P] Autonomous athletes benefit most from concurrent feedback.
- [E] Expert performers can process information while moving because their basic skills are automatic.
- [Ev] Elite gymnasts adjust body position mid-routine when coaches call out corrections during practice.
- [L] Therefore, concurrent feedback suits advanced athletes who can multitask effectively.
- [P] Associative stage learners show moderate readiness for concurrent feedback.
- [E] These athletes have automated basic movements and can handle some real-time corrections.
- [Ev] Intermediate tennis players can adjust their swing path when coaches provide cues during rallies.
- [L] Thus, concurrent feedback becomes increasingly useful as skills develop.
Delayed feedback is more appropriate for beginners:
- [P] Cognitive stage learners need delayed feedback to avoid overload.
- [E] Beginners must focus completely on movement execution and cannot process additional information simultaneously.
- [Ev] Novice golfers should receive swing feedback after completing shots to maintain concentration on technique.
- [L] Therefore, delayed feedback prevents information overload in early learning.
- [P] Delayed feedback remains valuable for complex analysis at all stages.
- [E] Even experts benefit from post-performance review for strategic improvements.
- [Ev] Professional footballers analyse match footage days later to understand tactical patterns.
- [L] Thus, delayed feedback serves different purposes across all skill levels.