Analyse what research tells us about the effectiveness of different types of feedback during the acquisition and development of a complex gymnastics skill like the handspring vault. (6 marks)
--- 20 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
Overview Statement
- Research reveals feedback effectiveness in handspring vault acquisition depends on learning stage, feedback type and timing.
- These components interact to shape skill development, with implications for coaching approaches.
Component Relationship 1
- Knowledge of performance feedback connects to safety-critical learning in cognitive stage gymnasts.
- Research shows this feedback type enables learners to understand body positioning before attempting complex movements.
- This prevents dangerous technique errors that knowledge of results alone cannot address.
- Video analysis enhances this relationship by providing visual confirmation of body positions that occur too rapidly for real-time awareness.
- This reveals that feedback type selection directly affects both safety and skill foundation development.
Component Relationship 2
- Feedback timing interacts with learner autonomy across developmental stages.
- Delayed feedback dominates cognitive stage learning because it allows processing time without overwhelming beginners.
- As gymnasts progress, concurrent feedback becomes valuable as their capacity increases.
- This progression leads to autonomous gymnasts self-selecting feedback moments.
- The pattern indicates that timing flexibility enables individualised learning rates while maintaining technique quality.
Implications and Synthesis
- These relationships demonstrate that effective feedback must change with learner development.
- The interconnection between type, timing and stage creates a flexible coaching framework.
- Therefore, rigid feedback approaches limit skill acquisition, while feedback that adjusts to learners optimises handspring vault development across all learning phases.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
Overview Statement
- Research reveals feedback effectiveness in handspring vault acquisition depends on learning stage, feedback type and timing.
- These components interact to shape skill development, with implications for coaching approaches.
Component Relationship 1
- Knowledge of performance feedback connects to safety-critical learning in cognitive stage gymnasts.
- Research shows this feedback type enables learners to understand body positioning before attempting complex movements.
- This prevents dangerous technique errors that knowledge of results alone cannot address.
- Video analysis enhances this relationship by providing visual confirmation of body positions that occur too rapidly for real-time awareness.
- This reveals that feedback type selection directly affects both safety and skill foundation development.
Component Relationship 2
- Feedback timing interacts with learner autonomy across developmental stages.
- Delayed feedback dominates cognitive stage learning because it allows processing time without overwhelming beginners.
- As gymnasts progress, concurrent feedback becomes valuable as their capacity increases.
- This progression leads to autonomous gymnasts self-selecting feedback moments.
- The pattern indicates that timing flexibility enables individualised learning rates while maintaining technique quality.
Implications and Synthesis
- These relationships demonstrate that effective feedback must change with learner development.
- The interconnection between type, timing and stage creates a flexible coaching framework.
- Therefore, rigid feedback approaches limit skill acquisition, while feedback that adjusts to learners optimises handspring vault development across all learning phases.