Research indicates that learners progress through cognitive, associative, and autonomous stages when acquiring skills. Analyse how a swimming coach would apply this specific research to develop effective feedback approaches for butterfly stroke technique. (6 marks)
--- 20 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
Overview Statement
- Research on learning stages connects to feedback approaches in butterfly stroke development.
- The relationship between stage characteristics and feedback needs determines coaching effectiveness, with implications for skill progression.
Component Relationship 1
- Cognitive stage limitations influence feedback delivery methods significantly.
- Swimmers’ inability to process complex information requires simplified, delayed feedback focusing on single elements.
- This contrasts with concurrent feedback that overwhelms beginners attempting butterfly’s demanding coordination.
- Augmented feedback dominates this stage because learners lack internal awareness.
- This relationship reveals that cognitive overload prevents skill acquisition when feedback complexity exceeds processing capacity.
Component Relationship 2
- Proprioceptive development interacts with feedback transitions across stages.
- Associative swimmers’ growing kinaesthetic awareness enables gradual shift from augmented to task-intrinsic feedback.
- This progression accelerates as swimmers reach autonomous stage, where internal feedback becomes primary.
- Feedback frequency decreases as self-detection abilities increase.
- This pattern demonstrates that feedback dependency inversely relates to skill development level.
Implications and Synthesis
- These relationships establish that effective butterfly coaching requires stage-matched feedback strategies.
- The interconnection between cognitive capacity and proprioceptive development creates natural progression pathways.
- Therefore, coaches must adjust feedback type, timing, and frequency to match learners’ evolving capabilities.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
Overview Statement
- Research on learning stages connects to feedback approaches in butterfly stroke development.
- The relationship between stage characteristics and feedback needs determines coaching effectiveness, with implications for skill progression.
Component Relationship 1
- Cognitive stage limitations influence feedback delivery methods significantly.
- Swimmers’ inability to process complex information requires simplified, delayed feedback focusing on single elements.
- This contrasts with concurrent feedback that overwhelms beginners attempting butterfly’s demanding coordination.
- Augmented feedback dominates this stage because learners lack internal awareness.
- This relationship reveals that cognitive overload prevents skill acquisition when feedback complexity exceeds processing capacity.
Component Relationship 2
- Proprioceptive development interacts with feedback transitions across stages.
- Associative swimmers’ growing kinaesthetic awareness enables gradual shift from augmented to task-intrinsic feedback.
- This progression accelerates as swimmers reach autonomous stage, where internal feedback becomes primary.
- Feedback frequency decreases as self-detection abilities increase.
- This pattern demonstrates that feedback dependency inversely relates to skill development level.
Implications and Synthesis
- These relationships establish that effective butterfly coaching requires stage-matched feedback strategies.
- The interconnection between cognitive capacity and proprioceptive development creates natural progression pathways.
- Therefore, coaches must adjust feedback type, timing, and frequency to match learners’ evolving capabilities.