Compare how continuous aerobic training would differ between a marathon runner preparing for a 42.2 km race and a rugby league player during their preseason training. (4 marks)
--- 12 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Keyword – “Compare”: Show how things are similar or different.
Sample Answer
- Marathon runner would implement longer continuous training sessions (1-3 hours) at lower intensity (60-70% MHR) to develop specific endurance capacity required for their event.
- Rugby league player would use shorter continuous sessions (30-45 minutes) at moderate intensity (70-80% MHR) to develop basic aerobic foundation without compromising sport-specific skill development.
- Marathon runner focuses on steady pace maintenance with minimal variation to simulate race conditions, whereas rugby league player may incorporate gradual intensity variations to reflect game demands.
- Marathon runner’s continuous training directly simulates competition environment, while rugby league player uses continuous training primarily as foundation before progressing to more sport-specific interval training.
Show Worked Solution
Keyword – “Compare”: Show how things are similar or different.
Sample Answer
- Marathon runner would implement longer continuous training sessions (1-3 hours) at lower intensity (60-70% MHR) to develop specific endurance capacity required for their event.
- Rugby league player would use shorter continuous sessions (30-45 minutes) at moderate intensity (70-80% MHR) to develop basic aerobic foundation without compromising sport-specific skill development.
- Marathon runner focuses on steady pace maintenance with minimal variation to simulate race conditions, whereas rugby league player may incorporate gradual intensity variations to reflect game demands.
- Marathon runner’s continuous training directly simulates competition environment, while rugby league player uses continuous training primarily as foundation before progressing to more sport-specific interval training.