SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

  • Login
  • Get Help
  • About

HMS, HIC 2024 HSC 28b

Evaluate the effectiveness of legislation and health promotion initiatives in addressing ONE major health issue affecting young people.   (12 marks)

--- 28 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Evaluation Statement

  • Legislation and health promotion initiatives are highly effective in addressing youth road safety when implemented together.
  • This evaluation examines behavioural change impact and long-term sustainability of interventions.

Behavioural Change Impact

  • Graduated licensing systems are highly influential in reducing youth road fatalities.
  • Evidence supporting this includes the 120 supervised hours requirement, passenger limits for P1 drivers and speed restrictions that have coincided with a sizeable reduction in collision rates.
  • The “Plan B” drink-driving campaign has also proven highly effective by promoting practical drink-driving alternatives. Campaign evaluations show a significant percentage decrease in alcohol-related crashes since 2012.
  • A critical strength of these approaches is the combination of addressing specific risk factors while building safe driving habits.
  • In this way, combined approaches can achieve comprehensive behaviour modification.

Long-term Sustainability

  • Legislative measures show excellent sustainability through systematic enforcement.
  • Mobile phone bans partially fulfil objectives due to enforcement challenges. While awareness has increased, detection difficulties limit long-term compliance although this shortcoming is being mitigated by technology developments.
  • Health promotion campaigns like “Speeding. No One Thinks Big of You” achieve moderate sustainability. Research indicates 75% of young males felt discouraged from speeding after viewing.
  • However, campaign effects diminish without ongoing reinforcement. Although effective for immediate impact, promotion requires continuous investment.

Final Evaluation

  • Weighing these factors shows integrated approaches prove most effective.
  • The strengths outweigh limitations because combining external regulation with attitude change can create lasting impact.
  • While legislation provides consistent framework, health promotion addresses cultural motivations.
  • The overall evaluation reveals neither approach alone suffices.
  • Implications suggest continued investment in both legislative and promotional strategies maximises youth road safety outcomes.
Show Worked Solution

Evaluation Statement

  • Legislation and health promotion initiatives are highly effective in addressing youth road safety when implemented together.
  • This evaluation examines behavioural change impact and long-term sustainability of interventions.

Behavioural Change Impact

  • Graduated licensing systems are highly influential in reducing youth road fatalities.
  • Evidence supporting this includes the 120 supervised hours requirement, passenger limits for P1 drivers, and speed restrictions that have coincided with a sizeable reduction in collision rates.
  • The “Plan B” drink-driving campaign has also proven highly effective by promoting practical drink-driving alternatives. Campaign evaluations show a significant percentage decrease in alcohol-related crashes since 2012.
  • A critical strength of these approaches is the combination of addressing specific risk factors while building safe driving habits.
  • In this way, combined approaches can achieve comprehensive behaviour modification.

Long-term Sustainability

  • Legislative measures show excellent sustainability through systematic enforcement.
  • Mobile phone bans partially fulfil objectives due to enforcement challenges. While awareness has increased, detection difficulties limit long-term compliance although this shortcoming is being mitigated by technology developments.
  • Health promotion campaigns like “Speeding. No One Thinks Big of You” achieve moderate sustainability. Research indicates 75% of young males felt discouraged from speeding after viewing.
  • However, campaign effects diminish without ongoing reinforcement. Although effective for immediate impact, promotion requires continuous investment.

Final Evaluation

  • Weighing these factors shows integrated approaches prove most effective.
  • The strengths outweigh limitations because combining external regulation with attitude change can create lasting impact.
  • While legislation provides consistent framework, health promotion addresses cultural motivations.
  • The overall evaluation reveals neither approach alone suffices.
  • Implications suggest continued investment in both legislative and promotional strategies maximises youth road safety outcomes.

♦♦ Mean mark 43%.

Filed Under: Models of health promotion Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, smc-5510-280-Legislation

Copyright © 2014–2025 SmarterEd.com.au · Log in