Identify an organisation that advocates for the health of young people and discuss its impact on the health of young people in the community. (6 marks)
--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
*Recommended phrases for balanced “for/against” language are bolded in the answer below.
Example 1: Office of the Advocate for Children and Young People (ACYP)
- ACYP is a government organisation that has significantly impacted youth health by consulting with over 40,000 young people through face-to-face meetings and online surveys. While this provides extensive reach for gathering youth perspectives, critics argue online methods may exclude digitally disadvantaged communities
- ACYP provides young people with a formal voice in parliament, ensuring their perspectives directly influence policies. On one hand, this creates unprecedented youth representation in government. On the other hand, young voices must still filter through adult decision-makers who control implementation
- By engaging youth in surveys, advocacy training and round tables, ACYP helps promote young people to become active participants. A key advantage is developing youth leadership skills for future advocacy. However, this must be weighed against the time commitment required.
- These consultations have led to parliamentary recommendations that better address actual youth needs. From one perspective, this ensures evidence-based policy development. An alternative view suggests recommendations often face lengthy implementation delays. Nevertheless, youth-informed policies create both opportunities for targeted solutions and challenges in translating recommendations into funded programs.
Example 2: National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO)
- NACCHO is an NGO that has substantially impacted Indigenous youth health by providing culturally appropriate healthcare through community-run organisations. While this offers services aligned with cultural values, critics contend limited funding restricts their reach to all remote communities.
- NACCHO’s approach ensures healthcare respects cultural traditions, increasing Indigenous youth engagement with services. A key advantage is building trust through familiar cultural practices. Conversely, maintaining both traditional and Western medical standards creates challenges in staff training and resource allocation.
- Evidence of NACCHO’s impact includes over 3 million healthcare interactions producing significant Indigenous patient growth. On one hand, these numbers demonstrate widespread community acceptance. However, this must be weighed against the strain on limited resources and potential service quality concerns.
- Research shows NACCHO achieves better long-term health outcomes than mainstream services for Indigenous communities. From one perspective, this validates community-led healthcare models. An alternative view suggests comparison difficulties arise from different patient demographics and health complexities. Nevertheless, the evidence supports culturally appropriate care despite ongoing funding uncertainties.
Show Worked Solution
*Recommended phrases for balanced “for/against” language are bolded in the answer below.
Example 1: Office of the Advocate for Children and Young People (ACYP)
- ACYP is a government organisation that has significantly impacted youth health by consulting with over 40,000 young people through face-to-face meetings and online surveys. While this provides extensive reach for gathering youth perspectives, critics argue online methods may exclude digitally disadvantaged communities
- ACYP provides young people with a formal voice in parliament, ensuring their perspectives directly influence policies. On one hand, this creates unprecedented youth representation in government. On the other hand, young voices must still filter through adult decision-makers who control implementation
- By engaging youth in surveys, advocacy training and round tables, ACYP helps promote young people to become active participants. A key advantage is developing youth leadership skills for future advocacy. However, this must be weighed against the time commitment required.
- These consultations have led to parliamentary recommendations that better address actual youth needs. From one perspective, this ensures evidence-based policy development. An alternative view suggests recommendations often face lengthy implementation delays. Nevertheless, youth-informed policies create both opportunities for targeted solutions and challenges in translating recommendations into funded programs.
Example 2: National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO)
- NACCHO is an NGO that has substantially impacted Indigenous youth health by providing culturally appropriate healthcare through community-run organisations. While this offers services aligned with cultural values, critics contend limited funding restricts their reach to all remote communities.
- NACCHO’s approach ensures healthcare respects cultural traditions, increasing Indigenous youth engagement with services. A key advantage is building trust through familiar cultural practices. Conversely, maintaining both traditional and Western medical standards creates challenges in staff training and resource allocation.
- Evidence of NACCHO’s impact includes over 3 million healthcare interactions producing significant Indigenous patient growth. On one hand, these numbers demonstrate widespread community acceptance. However, this must be weighed against the strain on limited resources and potential service quality concerns.
- Research shows NACCHO achieves better long-term health outcomes than mainstream services for Indigenous communities. From one perspective, this validates community-led healthcare models. An alternative view suggests comparison difficulties arise from different patient demographics and health complexities. Nevertheless, the evidence supports culturally appropriate care despite ongoing funding uncertainties.