Compare how program customisation approaches differ between recreational participants and elite athletes. (6 marks)
--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Similarities
- Both recreational participants and elite athletes require individual assessment data to identify personal strengths and weaknesses. Assessment information guides customised program development that addresses specific needs rather than generic training approaches.
- Goal setting remains essential for both populations to provide direction and motivation throughout training programs. Customisation involves aligning program design with individual objectives whether focused on health improvement or competitive performance enhancement.
- Progress monitoring through regular reassessment helps maintain program effectiveness for both recreational and elite populations. Customisation requires ongoing adjustments based on individual response patterns and changing needs over time.
Differences
- Recreational participants receive broader program customisation focusing on general health, safety, and enjoyment factors. Elite athletes require highly specific customisation targeting precise performance indicators and competitive demands within their particular sports.
- Assessment complexity varies significantly between populations with recreational clients receiving basic fitness evaluations. Elite athletes undergo comprehensive testing including advanced performance analysis and sport-specific capability measurements for detailed program customisation.
- Customisation frequency differs as recreational participants may receive program updates quarterly or seasonally. Elite athletes require continuous customisation with frequent modifications based on performance data, competition schedules, and training phase requirements.
Show Worked Solution
Similarities
- Both recreational participants and elite athletes require individual assessment data to identify personal strengths and weaknesses. Assessment information guides customised program development that addresses specific needs rather than generic training approaches.
- Goal setting remains essential for both populations to provide direction and motivation throughout training programs. Customisation involves aligning program design with individual objectives whether focused on health improvement or competitive performance enhancement.
- Progress monitoring through regular reassessment helps maintain program effectiveness for both recreational and elite populations. Customisation requires ongoing adjustments based on individual response patterns and changing needs over time.
Differences
- Recreational participants receive broader program customisation focusing on general health, safety, and enjoyment factors. Elite athletes require highly specific customisation targeting precise performance indicators and competitive demands within their particular sports.
- Assessment complexity varies significantly between populations with recreational clients receiving basic fitness evaluations. Elite athletes undergo comprehensive testing including advanced performance analysis and sport-specific capability measurements for detailed program customisation.
- Customisation frequency differs as recreational participants may receive program updates quarterly or seasonally. Elite athletes require continuous customisation with frequent modifications based on performance data, competition schedules, and training phase requirements.