Evaluate the effectiveness of different types of feedback for an elite athlete in the autonomous stage of learning who is attempting to refine a complex gymnastics routine. Justify your response with reference to specific feedback types. (8 marks)
--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
*Recommended “Evaluation” language is highlighted in bold throughout the answer below.
Evaluation Statement
- Different feedback types show varying effectiveness for elite autonomous gymnasts refining complex routines.
- This evaluation looks at how well feedback improves technique and whether it disrupts performance for autonomous gymnasts.
Feedback and improvement
- Task-intrinsic feedback is highly effective for elite gymnasts to detect precise errors.
- This is due to autonomous athletes possessing exceptional body awareness to feel minor deviations. For example, gymnasts instantly recognise when landing positions shift millimetres off-center.
- In this regard, delayed video analysis can achieve superior refinement by revealing imperceptible errors. Slow-motion replay identifies slight arm positioning flaws that feel correct during execution.
- A critical strength is combining internal sensing with objective external viewing.
- This comprehensive approach optimises technical refinement.
Performance disruption
- Concurrent feedback is only partially effective because it risks disrupting performance flow.
- Elite gymnasts can process brief real-time cues like “extend” during tumbling passes. However, excessive concurrent feedback interrupts automatic flow states.
- Performance feedback is most effective when it is highly specific. For example, discussing precise hip angles rather than general form is much better feedback for autonomous gymnasts.
- While strong for isolated corrections, concurrent feedback shows limitations during full routines. Although effective for single skills, it proves less suitable for complete performances.
Final Evaluation
- Weighing these factors shows task-intrinsic and delayed video feedback are highly effective.
- The strengths in precision refinement outweigh minimal disruption risks.
- Concurrent feedback remains moderately effective when used judiciously.
- Overall, this evaluation demonstrates autonomous gymnasts benefit most from self-generated and delayed feedback.
- Implications suggest coaches should prioritise video analysis while minimising real-time interruptions.
Show Worked Solution
*Recommended “Evaluation” language is highlighted in bold throughout the answer below.
Evaluation Statement
- Different feedback types show varying effectiveness for elite autonomous gymnasts refining complex routines.
- This evaluation looks at how well feedback improves technique and whether it disrupts performance for autonomous gymnasts.
Feedback and improvement
- Task-intrinsic feedback is highly effective for elite gymnasts to detect precise errors.
- This is due to autonomous athletes possessing exceptional body awareness to feel minor deviations. For example, gymnasts instantly recognise when landing positions shift millimetres off-center.
- In this regard, delayed video analysis can achieve superior refinement by revealing imperceptible errors. Slow-motion replay identifies slight arm positioning flaws that feel correct during execution.
- A critical strength is combining internal sensing with objective external viewing.
- This comprehensive approach optimises technical refinement.
Performance disruption
- Concurrent feedback is only partially effective because it risks disrupting performance flow.
- Elite gymnasts can process brief real-time cues like “extend” during tumbling passes. However, excessive concurrent feedback interrupts automatic flow states.
- Performance feedback is most effective when it is highly specific. For example, discussing precise hip angles rather than general form is much better feedback for autonomous gymnasts.
- While strong for isolated corrections, concurrent feedback shows limitations during full routines. Although effective for single skills, it proves less suitable for complete performances.
Final Evaluation
- Weighing these factors shows task-intrinsic and delayed video feedback are highly effective.
- The strengths in precision refinement outweigh minimal disruption risks.
- Concurrent feedback remains moderately effective when used judiciously.
- Overall, this evaluation demonstrates autonomous gymnasts benefit most from self-generated and delayed feedback.
- Implications suggest coaches should prioritise video analysis while minimising real-time interruptions.