Analyse different anaerobic interval training methods for individual sports versus team sports, including examples of contemporary training approaches. (8 marks)
--- 24 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Sample Answer
Overview Statement:
- Anaerobic interval training methods differ significantly between individual and team sports.
- Work intervals, recovery periods, and contemporary approaches interact with sport demands.
- These relationships determine optimal performance outcomes.
Component Relationship 1: Work-Rest Patterns
- Individual sports use longer intervals (60-90 seconds) with complete recovery (3-5 minutes).
- This connects to the need for maximum quality in each effort.
- A 100m sprinter performs 6 x 60m sprints at 95% intensity because each sprint must replicate race speed.
- Complete recovery enables consistent technique maintenance.
- This pattern reveals that individual sports prioritise movement quality over quantity.
Component Relationship 2: Recovery Demands
- Team sports employ shorter intervals (20-30 seconds) with incomplete rest.
- These patterns influence the development of repeated sprint ability.
- Soccer players perform 8 x 30-second efforts with 45-second recovery which mirrors game demands.
- Incomplete recovery causes players to adapt to performing under fatigue.
- The significance is team sports require sustained performance despite tiredness.
Contemporary Methods and Implications:
- Sprint Interval Training (SIT) combines maximal efforts with extended recovery.
- High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) offers flexible work-to-rest ratios.
- SIT protocols of 4-6 x 30-second all-out efforts lead to improved power across both sport types.
- HIIT adapts to specific needs: 30:30 for teams, 4min:2min for endurance events.
- Therefore, contemporary methods provide time-efficient training for diverse sporting demands.
Show Worked Solution
Sample Answer
Overview Statement:
- Anaerobic interval training methods differ significantly between individual and team sports.
- Work intervals, recovery periods, and contemporary approaches interact with sport demands.
- These relationships determine optimal performance outcomes.
Component Relationship 1: Work-Rest Patterns
- Individual sports use longer intervals (60-90 seconds) with complete recovery (3-5 minutes).
- This connects to the need for maximum quality in each effort.
- A 100m sprinter performs 6 x 60m sprints at 95% intensity because each sprint must replicate race speed.
- Complete recovery enables consistent technique maintenance.
- This pattern reveals that individual sports prioritise movement quality over quantity.
Component Relationship 2: Recovery Demands
- Team sports employ shorter intervals (20-30 seconds) with incomplete rest.
- These patterns influence the development of repeated sprint ability.
- Soccer players perform 8 x 30-second efforts with 45-second recovery which mirrors game demands.
- Incomplete recovery causes players to adapt to performing under fatigue.
- The significance is team sports require sustained performance despite tiredness.
Contemporary Methods and Implications:
- Sprint Interval Training (SIT) combines maximal efforts with extended recovery.
- High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) offers flexible work-to-rest ratios.
- SIT protocols of 4-6 x 30-second all-out efforts lead to improved power across both sport types.
- HIIT adapts to specific needs: 30:30 for teams, 4min:2min for endurance events.
- Therefore, contemporary methods provide time-efficient training for diverse sporting demands.