Consider the following statement written in the formal language of proof
\(\forall \theta \in\biggl(\dfrac{\pi}{2}, \pi\biggr) \exists\ \phi \in\biggl(\pi, \dfrac{3 \pi}{2}\biggr) ; \ \sin \theta=-\cos \phi\).
Which of the following best represents this statement?
- There exists a \(\theta\) in the second quadrant such that for all \(\phi\) in the third quadrant \(\sin \theta=-\cos \phi\).
- There exists a \(\phi\) in the third quadrant such that for all \(\theta\) in the second quadrant \(\sin \theta=-\cos \phi\).
- For all \(\theta\) in the second quadrant there exists a \(\phi\) in the third quadrant such that \(\sin \theta=-\cos \phi\).
- For all \(\phi\) in the third quadrant there exists a \(\theta\) in the second quadrant such that \(\sin \theta=-\cos \phi\).