Benefits:

• [P] Person-centred care models improve equity by addressing individual needs and circumstances of vulnerable populations.
• [E] This enables tailored service delivery that considers cultural backgrounds, language barriers and specific health challenges. Government and non-government partnerships provide comprehensive support addressing social determinants alongside medical treatment.
• [Ev] Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services demonstrate this approach by combining cultural safety with clinical care. Mental health services working with housing and employment organisations create holistic treatment addressing root causes of health inequity.
• [L] Therefore, person-centred models reduce systemic barriers and improve health outcomes for disadvantaged groups.

Challenges:

• [P] However, implementing person-centred models requires significant resource investment and coordination complexity.
• [E] This occurs when multiple organisations must collaborate effectively whilst maintaining different accountability frameworks and funding structures. Training requirements for cultural competency and individualised care approaches create additional costs.
• [Ev] Service fragmentation may persist when coordination mechanisms fail, leaving vulnerable populations navigating complex systems. Funding limitations restrict comprehensive service provision in areas with greatest need.
• [L] Consequently, implementation challenges may limit effectiveness without sustained investment and systematic reform.

• Geographic barriers limit rural population access to specialist services. Person-centred approaches use telehealth partnerships between government services and private providers enabling remote consultations.
• Cultural barriers prevent effective delivery for diverse communities experiencing discrimination. Collaboration between government funding and community-controlled organisations provides culturally safe care by staff understanding community needs.
• Economic barriers restrict access for low-income populations unable to afford private healthcare costs. Government subsidies combined with non-government programs ensure financial barriers do not prevent essential access.
• Social barriers include health literacy limitations disadvantaging vulnerable populations. Collaborative approaches provide patient advocacy, peer support and simplified pathways helping patients access services.

• Person-centred healthcare requires collaboration as no single sector can address all barriers to equitable access. Government provides universal coverage through Medicare but cannot deliver specialised services needed for individual circumstances.
• Non-government organisations fill access gaps by providing culturally appropriate services and advocacy that government services lack. They offer flexible delivery models adapting to community needs.
• Collaboration ensures comprehensive access by combining government funding with non-government innovation. This partnership addresses barriers and individual needs, creating pathways for appropriate care.