Compare how program customisation approaches differ between recreational participants and elite athletes. (6 marks)
--- 20 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
Show Answers Only
Benefits
- [P] Assessment-driven customisation significantly improves program effectiveness by targeting individual needs precisely and efficiently.
- [E] Personalised programs address specific strengths and weaknesses identified through systematic testing rather than generic approaches that may miss individual requirements.
- [Ev] A recreational client with poor cardiovascular fitness but strong upper body receives aerobic-focused training whilst maintaining strength levels through targeted exercises.
- [L] This demonstrates how customisation maximises training efficiency and individual progress rates through focused interventions.
- [P] Customised programs enhance participant motivation and adherence through relevant and achievable goal setting based on personal capabilities.
- [E] Individual assessment data enables realistic target establishment that maintains engagement throughout extended training periods and prevents unrealistic expectations.
- [Ev] Basketball players setting 5cm vertical jump improvements based on testing results show greater commitment than arbitrary goals without data foundation.
- [L] Therefore, data-driven customisation creates meaningful progress markers that sustain long-term participation and program compliance.
Challenges
- [P] Assessment-based customisation requires significant professional expertise and time investment from qualified fitness practitioners and specialists.
- [E] Comprehensive testing, data analysis, and individualised program design demand extensive knowledge and planning resources that increase program costs.
- [Ev] Detailed performance analysis for elite athletes involves multiple testing sessions and complex program modifications requiring specialised equipment and facilities.
- [L] This highlights how customisation complexity can limit accessibility for some fitness professionals and clients with restricted budgets.
Show Worked Solution
Benefits
- [P] Assessment-driven customisation significantly improves program effectiveness by targeting individual needs precisely and efficiently.
- [E] Personalised programs address specific strengths and weaknesses identified through systematic testing rather than generic approaches that may miss individual requirements.
- [Ev] A recreational client with poor cardiovascular fitness but strong upper body receives aerobic-focused training whilst maintaining strength levels through targeted exercises.
- [L] This demonstrates how customisation maximises training efficiency and individual progress rates through focused interventions.
- [P] Customised programs enhance participant motivation and adherence through relevant and achievable goal setting based on personal capabilities.
- [E] Individual assessment data enables realistic target establishment that maintains engagement throughout extended training periods and prevents unrealistic expectations.
- [Ev] Basketball players setting 5cm vertical jump improvements based on testing results show greater commitment than arbitrary goals without data foundation.
- [L] Therefore, data-driven customisation creates meaningful progress markers that sustain long-term participation and program compliance.
Challenges
- [P] Assessment-based customisation requires significant professional expertise and time investment from qualified fitness practitioners and specialists.
- [E] Comprehensive testing, data analysis, and individualised program design demand extensive knowledge and planning resources that increase program costs.
- [Ev] Detailed performance analysis for elite athletes involves multiple testing sessions and complex program modifications requiring specialised equipment and facilities.
- [L] This highlights how customisation complexity can limit accessibility for some fitness professionals and clients with restricted budgets.