Why did steel replace cast iron in bridges built after 1850 ?
- It is lighter in weight.
- It is easier to produce.
- It has greater tensile strength.
- It has greater compressive strength.
Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd
Why did steel replace cast iron in bridges built after 1850 ?
\( C \)
→ Steel is stronger, more ductile, and has a higher tensile strength compared to cast iron, allowing for the construction of larger and more durable structures.
→ Cast iron generally has greater compressive strength than steel (eliminate D).
\(\Rightarrow C \)
An image of an Allen truss bridge is shown.
Which of the following correctly identifies the loading conditions of an Allen truss bridge?
`D`
→ Members of a truss can only be in either tension or compression.
→ Steel has very high tensile strength, and although timber has lower tensile strength it has relatively high compressive strength.
→ Therefore D is the only answer that would produce an effective truss.
`=>D`
The image shows part of a large anchor recovered from waters off Western Australia. The anchor's approximate date of manufacture was 1790 .
This anchor is most likely made from
`C`
By Elimination:
→ In 1790 mild steel and silicon steel did not exist (eliminate `B` and `D`).
→ Since it is less brittle, wrought iron would have been used as anchors are subjected to sudden impacts against rocks (eliminate `A`).
`=>C`
The table shows materials that have been used to build civil structures over time.
Which row of the table shows the use of the materials in the correct historical order?
`A`
By Elimination:
→ Stainless steel must have been used after mild steel as it is an alloy of mild steel (not `C` or `D`)
→ Stone was used before iron as it did not require any processes to be formed (not `B`)
`=>A`