The following argument attempts to prove that \(0=1\). We evaluate \(\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{x}\, d x\) using the method of integration by parts. Explain what is wrong with this argument. (2 marks) --- 7 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
\(\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x}\,d x\)
\(=\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x} \times 1\, d x\)
\(=\displaystyle\frac{1}{x} \times x-\int-\frac{1}{x^2} x\, d x\)
\(=1+\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{x}\, d x\)
We may now subtract \(\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x}\,d x\) from both sides to show that \(0=1\).
Proof, EXT2 P1 2022 HSC 2 MC
The following proof aims to establish that `-4 = 0`
| `text{Let}` | `a=-4` | ||
| `=>` | `a^2 = 16 \ text{and} ` | `\ 4a + 4 = -12` | `text{Line 1}` |
| `=>` | `a^2 + 4a + 4 =` | `4` | `text{Line 2}` |
| `=>` | `(a + 2)^2 =` | `2^2` | `text{Line 3}` |
| `=>` | `a + 2 =` | `2` | `text{Line 4}` |
| `=>` | `a =` | `0` |
At which line is the implication incorrect?
- Line 1
- Line 2
- Line 3
- Line 4