SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

PHYSICS, M7 2019 VCE 14*

Students have set up a double-slit experiment using microwaves. The beam of microwaves passes through a metal barrier with two slits, shown as and in Figure 13. The students measure the intensity of the resulting beam at points along the line shown. They determine the positions of maximum intensity to be at the points labelled , and . 
 

The distance from to is 72.3 cm and the distance from to is 80.6 cm.

  1. What is the frequency of the microwaves transmitted through the slits? Show your working.   (2 marks)
  2. The signal strength is at a minimum approximately midway between points and .
  3. Explain the reason why the signal strength would be a minimum at this location.   (2 marks)

  4. The microwaves from the source are polarised.
  5. Explain what is meant by the term 'polarised'. You may use a diagram in your answer.   (2 marks)

Show Answers Only

a.    

b.    → Halfway between and   path difference = .

→ Therefore, destructive interference will occur and the signal strength will be a minimum.

c.   → Light is a transverse wave that can oscillate in any direction.

→ Light becomes polarised when its plane of oscillation is only in a single direction, as seen in the diagram below.
  

Show Worked Solution

a.    The path difference to is equal to 3 wavelengths of the microwaves.

 
   
 

 

 

♦♦ Mean mark (a) 35%.
COMMENT: Common error was not converting cm to m.

b.    → Halfway between and   path difference = .

→ Therefore, destructive interference will occur and the signal strength will be a minimum.
 

♦♦ Mean mark (b) 42%.

c.   → Light is a transverse wave that can oscillate in any direction.

→ Light becomes polarised when its plane of oscillation is only in a single direction, as seen in the diagram below.
 

♦ Mean mark (c) 50%.
Comment: Students are encouraged to use diagrams when possible.

PHYSICS, M7 2020 VCE 12

In a Young's double-slit interference experiment, laser light is incident on two slits, and , that are 4.0 × 10 m apart, as shown in Figure 11a.

Rays from the slits meet on a screen 2.00 m from the slits to produce an interference pattern. Point is at the centre of the pattern. Figure 11b shows the pattern obtained on the screen.
 

  1. There is a bright fringe at point on the screen.
  2. Explain how this bright fringe is formed.  (2 marks)
  1. The distance from the central bright fringe at point to the bright fringe at point P is 1.26 × 10 m.
  2. Calculate the wavelength of the laser light. Show your working.  (3 marks

Show Answers Only

a.    Bright fringe at point :

→ Young’s double slit experiment demonstrates that light can produce an interference pattern, from both constructive and destructive interference.

→ Point is the 4th bright fringe and it follows that the path difference between the two light beams is 4 wavelengths.

→ At this point, the peaks of the twos wave constructively interfere and a bright band is formed.

b.    

Show Worked Solution

a.    Bright fringe at point :

→ Young’s double slit experiment demonstrates that light can produce an interference pattern, from both constructive and destructive interference.

→ Point is the 4th bright fringe and it follows that the path difference between the two light beams is 4 wavelengths.

→ At this point, the peaks of the twos wave constructively interfere and a bright band is formed.
 

♦ Mean mark (a) 45%.

b.    Using    and 

→ is the distance between two bright bands and is the distance from the slits to the screen.

 
 
   
   
♦ Mean mark (b) 40%.

PHYSICS, M7 2021 VCE 13

In Young's double-slit experiment, the distance between two slits, S and S, is 2.0 mm. The slits are 1.0 m from a screen on which an interference pattern is observed, as shown in Figure 13a. Figure 13b shows the central maximum of the observed interference pattern.
 

  1. If a laser with a wavelength of 620 nm is used to illuminate the two slits, what would be the distance between two successive dark bands? Show your working.  (2 marks)
  1. Explain how this experiment supports the wave model of light.  (2 marks)

Show Answers Only

a.    

b.    The experiment supports the wave theory as follows:

→ Young’s double slit experiment demonstrates how light will refract and form an interference pattern against a screen.

→ Since interference is a wave phenomenon, the experiment supports the wave model of light.

Show Worked Solution

a.   

→ is the distance between two successive dark bands and is the distance from the slits to the screen.

 
 
   
   
♦ Mean mark (a) 51%.

 
b.    The experiment supports the wave theory as follows:

→ Young’s double slit experiment demonstrates how light will refract and form an interference pattern against a screen.

→ Since interference is a wave phenomenon, the experiment supports the wave model of light.

PHYSICS, M7 2023 VCE 13

A group of physics students undertake a Young's double-slit experiment using the apparatus shown in Figure 15. They use a green laser that produces light with a wavelength of 510 nm. The light is incident on two narrow slits, S and S. The distance between the two slits is 100 m.
 

An interference pattern is observed on a screen with points P, P and P being the locations of adjacent bright bands, shown in Figure 15. Point  P is the central bright band.

  1. Calculate the path difference between SP and SP. Give your answer in metres. Show your working.  (2 marks)
  1. The green laser is replaced by a red laser.
  2. Describe the effect of this change on the spacing between adjacent bright bands.  (1 mark)
  1. Explain how Young's double-slit experiment provides evidence for the wave-like nature of light and not the particle-like nature of light.  (3 marks)
Show Answers Only

a.    

b.    The spacing between adjacent bright bands will increase.

c.    Evidence for the wave-like nature of light:

→ Young’s double slit experiment was used to show that light can produce an interference pattern as it diffracts when it passes through the slits.

→ As this is a wave phenomenon, the experiment provided valuable evidence to support the wave-like nature of light.

→ Using the particle-like nature of light as a model, two bright bands would have been expected behind the two slits as the particles would have passed through the slits in a straight line which was not observed.

Show Worked Solution

a.   

.

♦ Mean mark (a) 45%.

b.    The spacing will increase.

→ , where is the length between the screen and the slits and is the distance between adjacent bright bands.

→ Since , as the wavelength of light increases from green to red, so will the spacing between adjacent bright bands.
 

c.    Evidence for the wave-like nature of light:

→ Young’s double slit experiment was used to show that light can produce an interference pattern as it diffracts when it passes through the slits.

→ As this is a wave phenomenon, the experiment provided valuable evidence to support the wave-like nature of light.

→ Using the particle-like nature of light as a model, two bright bands would have been expected behind the two slits as the particles would have passed through the slits in a straight line which was not observed.

PHYSICS, M7 EQ-Bank 26

The diagram shows a light source, slits and a translucent screen arranged for an experiment on light. Light and dark bands form on the screen. The light has a wavelength of 590 nm. The diagram is not to scale.
 

  1. Explain how any one of the dark bands forms on the screen.  (3 marks)
  1. The distance between the centres of the double slit is 0.15 mm, and the distance between the double slit and the screen is 0.75 m.
  2. Calculate the distance on the screen from the centre of the central maximum to the centre of a second-order bright band.  (3 marks)
Show Answers Only

a.    → When light arrives at the double slit, it undergoes diffraction.

→ The two slits act as sources of secondary wavefronts and light travels from both slits to the screen.

→ When light from one slit travels any odd multiple of more than light from the other slit to the screen, it is out of phase and destructive interference occurs. Here waves superimpose and cancel each other out, creating dark bands.

→ For example, the dark bands either side of the central maximum form where light from one slit travels further than light from the other slit.
 

b.   

Show Worked Solution

a.    → When light arrives at the double slit, it undergoes diffraction.

→ The two slits act as sources of secondary wavefronts and light travels from both slits to the screen.

→ When light from one slit travels any odd multiple of more than light from the other slit to the screen, it is out of phase and destructive interference occurs. Here waves superimpose and cancel each other out, creating dark bands.

→ For example, the dark bands either side of the central maximum form where light from one slit travels further than light from the other slit.
 

b.   

 
 

 

  
→ Using trigonometry, , where is the angular separation of the second order bright band from the central maximum and is the distance between the centre of the central maximum and the centre of the second order bright band.

→ As the angle, is small, the approximation is valid:

 
 
   

PHYSICS, M7 EQ-Bank 27

Monochromatic light of wavelength strikes a double slit and produces bright and dark fringes on a screen. Light from slit travels along path and light from slit travels along to produce the dark fringe shown.
 

Calculate the difference in length between and ?  (2 marks)

Show Answers Only

Show Worked Solution

→ Dark fringes occur when the path difference is an odd multiple of . i.e at , , etc.

→ This is the second dark fringe from the central maximum.

→ So, the difference in length between and is

PHYSICS M7 2022 HSC 27

A laser producing red light of wavelength 655 nm is directed onto double slits separated by a distance, . A screen is placed behind the double slits.
 


 

  1. Newton proposed a model of light. Use a labelled sketch to show the pattern on the screen that would be expected from Newton's proposed model.   (2 marks)
     

     
  2. When the laser light is turned on, a series of vertical bright lines are seen on the screen.
     
 
  1. Calculate the angle, , between the centre line and the bright line at .   (3 marks)
  1. The laser is replaced with one producing green light of wavelength 520 nm.
  2. Explain the difference in the pattern that would be produced.   (2 marks)
Show Answers Only

a.   
       

 
b.   

c.   Consider 

→

→ Using light with a shorter wavelength decreases the angular separation of bright fringes.

→ The bright lines will appear closer together.

Show Worked Solution
a.   
     

Mean mark part (a) 53%.

b.   Using 

   
   

 

c.   Consider 

→

→ Using light with a shorter wavelength decreases the angular separation of bright fringes.

→ The bright lines will appear closer together.

PHYSICS, M7 2019 HSC 15 MC

Monochromatic light passes through two slits 1 apart. The resulting diffraction pattern is measured at a distance of 0.3 m.
 


 

This diffraction pattern can be analysed using the equation  .

What values of and should be used in the equation?

Show Answers Only

Show Worked Solution

is the distance between the slits, in this case,

  is the angular deviation of a maximum, measured from the centre of the slits 

PHYSICS, M7 2021 HSC 33

Two experiments are performed with identical light sources having a wavelength of 400 nm.

In experiment , the light is incident on a pair of narrow slits  m  apart, producing a pattern on a screen located 3.0 m behind the slits.
 

In experiment , the light is incident on different metal samples inside an evacuated tube as shown. The kinetic energy of any emitted photoelectrons can be measured.
 

Some results from experiment are shown.
 

How do the results from Experiment and Experiment support TWO different models of light? In your answer, include a quantitative analysis of each experiment.   (9 marks)

Show Answers Only

→ Experiment A supports the wave model of light as it demonstrates light undergoing diffraction as well as constructive and destructive interference, which are wave properties.

→ When light is incident upon the slits, it diffracts and causes the slit to act as a source of wavefronts. When light from the slits arrives at the screen, bright bands are produced when light waves arrive in phase and undergo constructive interference.

→ Dark bands are produced when light waves arrive at the screen out of phase and undergo destructive interference.

→ The spacing between adjacent bright bands can be calculated:

             
 
 
 

 
→ Experiment B supports Einstein’s particle, or photon model of light. This model can calculate the photon energy of incident light and explain why photons are emitted from calcium but not nickel:


 

→ This energy is greater than the work function of calcium, explaining why one photon has enough energy to liberate a photoelectron from the calcium sample. However, this energy is less than the work function of nickel, explaining why no photoelectrons were observed from the nickel sample.

→ These observations support the particle model of light. Applying the particle model, the kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted from calcium can be calculated:

Show Worked Solution

→ Experiment A supports the wave model of light as it demonstrates light undergoing diffraction as well as constructive and destructive interference, which are wave properties.

→ When light is incident upon the slits, it diffracts and causes the slit to act as a source of wavefronts. When light from the slits arrives at the screen, bright bands are produced when light waves arrive in phase and undergo constructive interference.

→ Dark bands are produced when light waves arrive at the screen out of phase and undergo destructive interference.

→ The spacing between adjacent bright bands can be calculated:

             
 
 
 

 
→ Experiment B supports Einstein’s particle, or photon model of light. This model can calculate the photon energy of incident light and explain why photons are emitted from calcium but not nickel:


 

→ This energy is greater than the work function of calcium, explaining why one photon has enough energy to liberate a photoelectron from the calcium sample. However, this energy is less than the work function of nickel, explaining why no photoelectrons were observed from the nickel sample.

→ These observations support the particle model of light. Applying the particle model, the kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted from calcium can be calculated:


♦ Mean mark 52%.