SmarterEd

Aussie Maths & Science Teachers: Save your time with SmarterEd

  • Login
  • Get Help
  • About

PHYSICS, M8 2025 HSC 33

Analyse the role of experimental evidence and theoretical ideas in developing the Standard Model of matter.   (6 marks)

--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Overview Statement

  • The Standard Model’s development depends on the cyclical relationship between experimental evidence and theoretical predictions.
  • These components interact with each other, where theory guides experiments and results validate or refine theory.

Particle Discovery

  • Theoretical predictions lead to targeted experimental searches for specific particles.
  • The Higgs Boson was theoretically proposed decades before its experimental discovery to explain particle mass.
  • Cloud chambers discovered antimatter after theory predicted its existence.
  • Particle accelerators verified quarks existed by revealing the internal structure of protons and neutrons.
  • This pattern shows theory provides the framework while experiments confirm reality.
  • Consequently, successful verification enables confidence in theoretical models and guides further predictions.

Experimental Tools Driving Theoretical Refinement

  • High-energy particle accelerators create small wavelength ‘matter probes’ allowing high-resolution investigation of matter’s structure.
  • These experiments verified electroweak theory by demonstrating electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces result from the same underlying interaction.
  • Unexpected experimental results sometimes cause theoretical modifications or new predictions.
  • The significance is that increasingly powerful experimental tools reveal deeper layers of matter structure.

Implications and Synthesis

  • This reveals the Standard Model emerged from iterative cycles where theory and experiment continuously influence each other.
  • Neither component alone could have produced the model.
  • Together, they form a self-correcting system advancing our understanding of fundamental matter.
Show Worked Solution

Overview Statement

  • The Standard Model’s development depends on the cyclical relationship between experimental evidence and theoretical predictions.
  • These components interact with each other, where theory guides experiments and results validate or refine theory.

Particle Discovery

  • Theoretical predictions lead to targeted experimental searches for specific particles.
  • The Higgs Boson was theoretically proposed decades before its experimental discovery to explain particle mass.
  • Cloud chambers discovered antimatter after theory predicted its existence.
  • Particle accelerators verified quarks existed by revealing the internal structure of protons and neutrons.
  • This pattern shows theory provides the framework while experiments confirm reality.
  • Consequently, successful verification enables confidence in theoretical models and guides further predictions.

Experimental Tools Driving Theoretical Refinement

  • High-energy particle accelerators create small wavelength ‘matter probes’ allowing high-resolution investigation of matter’s structure.
  • These experiments verified electroweak theory by demonstrating electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces result from the same underlying interaction.
  • Unexpected experimental results sometimes cause theoretical modifications or new predictions.
  • The significance is that increasingly powerful experimental tools reveal deeper layers of matter structure.

Implications and Synthesis

  • This reveals the Standard Model emerged from iterative cycles where theory and experiment continuously influence each other.
  • Neither component alone could have produced the model.
  • Together, they form a self-correcting system advancing our understanding of fundamental matter.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

PHYSICS, M7 2024 HSC 32

Many scientists have performed experiments to explore the interaction of light and matter.

Analyse how evidence from at least THREE such experiments has contributed to our understanding of physics.   (8 marks)

--- 16 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Students could include any of the following experiments:

  • Black body radiation experiments (M7 Quantum Nature of Light)
  • Photoelectric experiments (M7 Quantum Nature of Light)
  • Spectroscopy experiments (M8 Origins of Elements)
  • Polarisation experiments (M7 Wave Nature of Light)
  • Interference and diffraction (M7 Wave Nature of Light)
  • Cosmic gamma rays (M7 Special Relativity and/or M8 Deep Inside the Atom and standard model).

Young’s Double-Slit Experiment:

  • Young’s 1801 double slit experiment aimed to determine light’s wave-particle nature.
  • He passed coherent light through two slits and observed the pattern on a screen.
  • Instead of Newton’s predicted two bright bands, Young observed alternating bright and dark bands.
  • This interference pattern occurred due to light diffraction and interference, which  re wave properties.
  • The experiment provided strong evidence for light behaving as a wave at macroscopic scales. 

Planck and the Blackbody Radiation Crisis:

  • Late 19th century scientists studied the relationship between black body radiation’s wavelength and intensity.
  • Experimental observations showed intensity peaked at a specific wavelength, contradicting classical physics predictions.
  • Classical physics led to the “ultraviolet catastrophe,” which violated energy conservation.
  • Planck’s thought experiment resolved this by proposing energy was transferred in discrete packets (quanta) where  \(E=hf\).
  • This revolutionary idea marked a shift from classical physics to quantum theory. 

Einstein and the Photoelectric Effect:

  • In 1905, Einstein built upon Plank’s idea of quantised energy to propose that light was made up of quantised photons where \(E=hf\).
  • Einstein proposition explained why electrons are ejected from metal surfaces only when light exceeds a minimum frequency.
  • Previous to Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect a high intensity of light corresponds to a high energy.
  • Einstein proposed that the KE of the emitted electrons was proportion to the frequency of the light rather than the intensity of the light. 
  • This development in the understanding of the interaction of light and matter at the atomic level shifted our understanding of light to a wave-particle duality model.

Cosmic Ray Experiments and the development of the Standard Model:

  • In 1912, Victor Hess discovered cosmic rays through high-altitude balloon experiments, finding that radiation increased with altitude rather than decreased as expected.
  • The study of cosmic rays led to the unexpected discovery of new particles, including the positron and muon, which couldn’t be explained by the known models of matter.
  • These discoveries from cosmic rays helped inspire the development of modern particle accelerators and contributed to the formulation of the quark model in the 1960s.
  • Eventually further studies on these newly discovered particles led to the development of the Standard Model of particle physics, which organises all known elementary particles and their interactions.

Show Worked Solution

Students could include any of the following experiments:

  • Black body radiation experiments (M7 Quantum Nature of Light)
  • Photoelectric experiments (M7 Quantum Nature of Light)
  • Spectroscopy experiments (M8 Origins of Elements)
  • Polarisation experiments (M7 Wave Nature of Light)
  • Interference and diffraction (M7 Wave Nature of Light)
  • Cosmic gamma rays (M7 Special Relativity and/or M8 Deep Inside the Atom and standard model).

Young’s Double-Slit Experiment:

  • Young’s 1801 double slit experiment aimed to determine light’s wave-particle nature.
  • He passed coherent light through two slits and observed the pattern on a screen.
  • Instead of Newton’s predicted two bright bands, Young observed alternating bright and dark bands.
  • This interference pattern occurred due to light diffraction and interference, which  re wave properties.
  • The experiment provided strong evidence for light behaving as a wave at macroscopic scales. 

Planck and the Blackbody Radiation Crisis:

  • Late 19th century scientists studied the relationship between black body radiation’s wavelength and intensity.
  • Experimental observations showed intensity peaked at a specific wavelength, contradicting classical physics predictions.
  • Classical physics led to the “ultraviolet catastrophe,” which violated energy conservation.
  • Planck’s thought experiment resolved this by proposing energy was transferred in discrete packets (quanta) where  \(E=hf\).
  • This revolutionary idea marked a shift from classical physics to quantum theory. 

Einstein and the Photoelectric Effect:

  • In 1905, Einstein built upon Plank’s idea of quantised energy to propose that light was made up of quantised photons where \(E=hf\).
  • Einstein proposition explained why electrons are ejected from metal surfaces only when light exceeds a minimum frequency.
  • Previous to Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect a high intensity of light corresponds to a high energy.
  • Einstein proposed that the KE of the emitted electrons was proportion to the frequency of the light rather than the intensity of the light. 
  • This development in the understanding of the interaction of light and matter at the atomic level shifted our understanding of light to a wave-particle duality model.

Cosmic Ray Experiments and the development of the Standard Model:

  • In 1912, Victor Hess discovered cosmic rays through high-altitude balloon experiments, finding that radiation increased with altitude rather than decreased as expected.
  • The study of cosmic rays led to the unexpected discovery of new particles, including the positron and muon, which couldn’t be explained by the known models of matter.
  • These discoveries from cosmic rays helped inspire the development of modern particle accelerators and contributed to the formulation of the quark model in the 1960s.
  • Eventually further studies on these newly discovered particles led to the development of the Standard Model of particle physics, which organises all known elementary particles and their interactions.
♦ Mean mark 50%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom, Light and Special Relativity, Light: Quantum Model, Light: Wave Model Tagged With: Band 5, Band 6, smc-3697-20-Young, smc-3698-10-Photoelectric Effect, smc-3698-60-Experiments, smc-3698-70-Planck, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

PHYSICS, M8 2024 HSC 3 MC

Which of the following is a fundamental particle in the Standard Model of matter?

  1. Hadron
  2. Neutron
  3. Photon
  4. Proton
Show Answers Only

\(C\)

Show Worked Solution
  • Hadrons are subatomic particles which are composed of two or more quarks. Protons and Neutrons are categorised as hadrons as they are both composed of 3 quarks. 
  • Hadrons, protons and neutrons are not fundamental particles as they are all composed of quarks.
  • The photon is a fundamental particle, classified as a gauge boson and mediates the electromagnetic force.

\(\Rightarrow C\)

♦ Mean mark 55%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

PHYSICS, M8 2023 HSC 33

Consider the following statement.

The interaction of subatomic particles with fields, as well as with other types of particles and matter, has increased our understanding of processes that occur in the physical world and of the properties of the subatomic particles themselves.

Justify this statement with reference to observations that have been made and experiments that scientists have carried out.   (9 marks)

--- 22 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Thomson’s Experiment:

  • Thomson’s experiment tested the interaction of cathode rays (which he discovered were negatively charged subatomic particles and named them electrons) with electric and magnetic fields to determine the charge to mass ratio (\(\dfrac{q}{m}\)) of the electrons.
  • Using both the electric and magnetic fields, Thomson balanced the forces to ensure the cathode rays travelled through undeflected. Thus:
  •    \(F_E = F_B \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ qE=qvB \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ v=\dfrac{E}{B}\)
  • Using the magnetic field and known velocity, the cathode rays travelled in a circular path due to their negative charges interacting with the magnetic field. Thus:
  •    \(F_c=F_B\ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \dfrac{mv^2}{r}=qvB \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \dfrac{q}{m}=\dfrac{v}{Br}\)
  • The charge to mass ratio was determined to be 0.77 \(\times\) 10\(^{11}\) Ckg\(^{-1}\) and was \(\dfrac{1}{1800}\) times smaller than the charge to mass ratio of the proton. The number was also the same regardless of the metal cathode used, thus Thomson determined this particle was a fundamental constitute of all matter. 
  • Therefore, the statement is true as the observations and experiment undertaken by Thomson using the interactions of particles and fields led to a greater understanding of the electrons. 

Chadwick’s Experiment:

  • In Chadwick’s experiment, he irradiated beryllium with alpha particles which emitted a deeply penetrating radiation with neutral charge. When this particle was directed into paraffin wax, protons were emitted and detected on a screen. 
  • Using the Laws of conservation of energy and momentum, Chadwick proposed the idea of a neutral particle and named it the neutron. He determined that the mass of this particle must be slightly greater than the mass of the proton.
  • Therefore, Chadwick’s observations of the neutrons led to a greater understanding of the properties of the particle, thus justifying the statement above.  

Observations using particle accelerators:

  • Particle accelerators have led to many new scientific discoveries as a result of the interaction of particles with fields and particle-particle interactions.
  • Scientists have come to a greater understanding of quarks and other subatomic particles within the standard model of matter and processes of the physical world including decay trails and momentum dilation.
  • The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) can accelerate particles close to the speed of light using electric and magnetic fields. When particles collide, the kinetic energy is converted into mass using Einstein’s equation  \(E=mc^2\).
  • The new particles formed as a result of these collisions led to the development of the standard model and increased scientific understanding of subatomic particles including up and down quarks, W/Z bosons and the Higgs Boson.
  • These subatomic particles have very short lifetimes before decaying into more stable particles. Our knowledge of them is primarily from studying their decay properties which has led to a greater understanding of particle decay trails.
  • Observations of interactions within particles accelerators has also increased the scientific understanding of momentum dilation. As particles reach relativistic speeds, a greater force is required to accelerate them than classical physics predicts which is due to mass and momentum dilation. 

Other Answers could include:

  • Millikan’s Oil drop experiment.
  • The photoelectric effect.
  • Geiger Marsden experiment.
  • Davisson Germer experiment.
  • Observations of Muons.
Show Worked Solution

One (of many) exemplar responses.

Thomson’s Experiment:

  • Thomson’s experiment tested the interaction of cathode rays (which he discovered were negatively charged subatomic particles and named them electrons) with electric and magnetic fields to determine the charge to mass ratio (\(\dfrac{q}{m}\)) of the electrons.
  • Using both the electric and magnetic fields, Thomson balanced the forces to ensure the cathode rays travelled through undeflected. Thus:
  •    \(F_E = F_B \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ qE=qvB \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ v=\dfrac{E}{B}\)
  • Using the magnetic field and known velocity, the cathode rays travelled in a circular path due to their negative charges interacting with the magnetic field. Thus:
  •    \(F_c=F_B\ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \dfrac{mv^2}{r}=qvB \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \dfrac{q}{m}=\dfrac{v}{Br}\)
  • The charge to mass ratio was determined to be 0.77 \(\times\) 10\(^{11}\) Ckg\(^{-1}\) and was \(\dfrac{1}{1800}\) times smaller than the charge to mass ratio of the proton. The number was also the same regardless of the metal cathode used, thus Thomson determined this particle was a fundamental constitute of all matter. 
  • Therefore, the statement is true as the observations and experiment undertaken by Thomson using the interactions of particles and fields led to a greater understanding of the electrons.

Chadwick’s Experiment:

  • In Chadwick’s experiment, he irradiated beryllium with alpha particles which emitted a deeply penetrating radiation with neutral charge. When this particle was directed into paraffin wax, protons were emitted and detected on a screen. 
  • Using the Laws of conservation of energy and momentum, Chadwick proposed the idea of a neutral particle and named it the neutron. He determined that the mass of this particle must be slightly greater than the mass of the proton.
  • Therefore, Chadwick’s observations of the neutrons led to a greater understanding of the properties of the particle, thus justifying the statement above.  

Observations using particle accelerators:

  • Particle accelerators have led to many new scientific discoveries as a result of the interaction of particles with fields and particle-particle interactions.
  • Scientists have come to a greater understanding of quarks and other subatomic particles within the standard model of matter and processes of the physical world including decay trails and momentum dilation.
  • The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) can accelerate particles close to the speed of light using electric and magnetic fields. When particles collide, the kinetic energy is converted into mass using Einstein’s equation  \(E=mc^2\).
  • The new particles formed as a result of these collisions led to the development of the standard model and increased scientific understanding of subatomic particles including up and down quarks, W/Z bosons and the Higgs Boson.
  • These subatomic particles have very short lifetimes before decaying into more stable particles. Our knowledge of them is primarily from studying their decay properties which has led to a greater understanding of particle decay trails.
  • Observations of interactions within particles accelerators has also increased the scientific understanding of momentum dilation. As particles reach relativistic speeds, a greater force is required to accelerate them than classical physics predicts which is due to mass and momentum dilation. 

Other Answers could include:

  • Millikan’s Oil drop experiment.
  • The photoelectric effect.
  • Geiger Marsden experiment.
  • Davisson Germer experiment.
  • Observations of Muons.
♦♦ Mean mark 45%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom, Quantum Mechanical Nature of the Atom, Structure of the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, Band 6, smc-3701-10-Cathode Rays and Thomson, smc-3701-20-Millikan, smc-3701-60-Chadwick, smc-3702-40-De Broglie, smc-3704-10-Standard Model, smc-3704-25-Linear Accelerator

PHYSICS, M8 EQ-Bank 28

Our understanding of matter is still incomplete and the Standard Model of matter is still being validated and tested. Technology plays a substantial role in this.

Explain the role of technology in developing both the Standard Model of matter and our understanding in ONE other area of physics.  (9 marks)

--- 18 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Technology and the development of the Standard Model

  • Technology has played a significant role in developing the standard model of matter.
  • Scientists have used the technology of linear accelerators to accelerate a beam of electrons at stationary protons. Technology was then used to analyse the scattering patterns of the electrons which was inconsistent with protons being fundamental particles.
  • It was determined that protons were comprised of both positive and negative internal charges. This led to the discovery of quarks.
  • Further, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is technology which accelerates protons to speeds extremely close to the speed of light, and collides them with each other.
  • When these protons collide, their dilated kinetic energy is converted to mass in the form of new particles such as the Higgs Boson. This significantly develops our understanding of the standard model of matter. 

Technology and Special Relativity

  • Another area of physics in which technology has played a vital role is special relativity.
  • Einstein’s prediction of time dilation has been validated by the Hafele-Keating experiment. Technology such as atomic clocks and high speed aeroplanes were used to demonstrate time differences recorded when atomic clocks were flown around the world.
  • In this instance, technology made it possible to validate Einstein’s predictions, improving our understanding of special relativity.
Show Worked Solution

Technology and the development of the Standard Model

  • Technology has played a significant role in developing the standard model of matter.
  • Scientists have used the technology of linear accelerators to accelerate a beam of electrons at stationary protons. Technology was then used to analyse the scattering patterns of the electrons which was inconsistent with protons being fundamental particles.
  • It was determined that protons were comprised of both positive and negative internal charges. This led to the discovery of quarks.
  • Further, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is technology which accelerates protons to speeds extremely close to the speed of light, and collides them with each other.
  • When these protons collide, their dilated kinetic energy is converted to mass in the form of new particles such as the Higgs Boson. This significantly develops our understanding of the standard model of matter. 

Technology and Special Relativity

  • Another area of physics in which technology has played a vital role is special relativity.
  • Einstein’s prediction of time dilation has been validated by the Hafele-Keating experiment. Technology such as atomic clocks and high speed aeroplanes were used to demonstrate time differences recorded when atomic clocks were flown around the world.
  • In this instance, technology made it possible to validate Einstein’s predictions, improving our understanding of special relativity.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, Band 6, smc-3704-10-Standard Model, smc-3704-25-Linear Accelerator

PHYSICS, M8 2015 HSC 34e

Assess the impact of THREE advances in knowledge about particles and forces on the understanding of the atomic nucleus.   (6 marks)

--- 12 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only

Three of many possible developments are included below.

Advance One:

  • The discovery of the neutron allowed scientists to understand the masses of the nuclei.
  • This discovery enabled scientists to better identify trends in both the periodic table.

Advance Two:

  • Knowledge of the strong nuclear force helps us to explain the interaction between protons and neutrons in the nucleus, and how this force can overcome the electrostatic  force of repulsion.
  • This discovery helps to explain why certain isotopes are unstable.

Advance Three:

  • Knowledge that protons and neutrons are made from different combinations of two types of quarks.
  • This helped to unify our understanding of subatomic particles, informing our base knowledge of quantum physics through the development of the Standard Model.
Show Worked Solution

Advance One:

  • The discovery of the neutron allowed scientists to understand the masses of the nuclei.
  • This discovery enabled scientists to better identify trends in both the periodic table.

Advance Two:

  • Knowledge of the strong nuclear force helps us to explain the interaction between protons and neutrons in the nucleus, and how this force can overcome the electrostatic  force of repulsion.
  • This discovery helps to explain why certain isotopes are unstable.

Advance Three:

  • Knowledge that protons and neutrons are made from different combinations of two types of quarks.
  • This helped to unify our understanding of subatomic particles, informing our base knowledge of quantum physics through the development of the Standard Model.

♦♦♦ Mean mark 32%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, Band 6, smc-3704-10-Standard Model, smc-3704-20-Quarks

PHYSICS, M8 2016 HSC 34d

Explain how evidence from experiments involving particle accelerators and detectors has provided support for the standard model of matter.   (4 marks)

--- 9 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only
  • High energy collisions in particle accelerators between heavier particles such as protons and materials such as lead have produced many different types of subatomic particles that had never been observed in experiments previously.
  • Properties of these particles, such as momentum and charge, could be deduced from measurements made using a range of sensitive detectors such as calorimeters.
  • The standard model provides an important framework by which physicists can understanding these new particles and their behaviour in collisions.
  • The standard model has predicted the existence of certain particles which were subsequently detected in experiments. This provides further  important validation of the model.
Show Worked Solution
  • High energy collisions in particle accelerators between heavier particles such as protons and materials such as lead have produced many different types of subatomic particles that had never been observed in experiments previously.
  • Properties of these particles, such as momentum and charge, could be deduced from measurements made using a range of sensitive detectors such as calorimeters.
  • The standard model provides an important framework by which physicists can understanding these new particles and their behaviour in collisions.
  • The standard model has predicted the existence of certain particles which were subsequently detected in experiments. This provides further  important validation of the model.

♦♦ Mean mark 38%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model, smc-3704-25-Linear Accelerator

PHYSICS, M8 2017 HSC 34ai

State the composition of the He-3 nucleus in terms of fundamental particles.   (2 marks)

--- 4 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only
  • He-3 nucleus is made up of 1 neutron and 2 protons.
  • Each neutron and proton is itself made up of three quarks.
Show Worked Solution
  • He-3 nucleus is made up of 1 neutron and 2 protons.
  • Each neutron and proton is itself made up of three quarks.

Mean mark 52%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

PHYSICS, M8 2020 HSC 30a

Explain, using an example, how a particle accelerator has provided evidence for the Standard Model of matter.   (3 marks)

--- 7 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only
  • A linear accelerator used electric fields to accelerate electrons to very fast speeds and collide them with protons.
  • The scattering of these electrons was analysed with technology and was inconsistent with protons being fundamental particles.
  • The obtained data showed that protons contained both positive and negative internal charges.
  • This observation contributed to the idea that protons were made up of quarks, and so provided evidence for the Standard Model of Matter.

 Answers could also mention:

  • Collision of protons accelerated to relativistic speeds at the LHC producing new, massive particles such as the Higgs-Boson hypothesised by the Standard Model of Matter. 
Show Worked Solution

  • A linear accelerator used electric fields to accelerate electrons to very fast speeds and collide them with protons.
  • The scattering of these electrons was analysed with technology and was inconsistent with protons being fundamental particles.
  • The obtained data showed that protons contained both positive and negative internal charges.
  • This observation contributed to the idea that protons were made up of quarks, and so provided evidence for the Standard Model of Matter.

 Answers could also mention:

  • Collision of protons accelerated to relativistic speeds at the LHC producing new, massive particles such as the Higgs-Boson hypothesised by the Standard Model of Matter. 


♦ Mean mark 46%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model, smc-3704-25-Linear Accelerator

PHYSICS, M8 2020 HSC 25

Describe the hydrogen atom in terms of the Standard Model of matter.   (4 marks)

--- 12 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---

Show Answers Only
  • The hydrogen atom is composed of one proton in the nucleus and one orbiting electron.
  • The proton is a hadron comprised of three quarks, two up quarks each with charge  `+(2)/(3)`  and one down quark with charge `-(1)/(3)`. These quarks are fundamental particles and are bound together by the strong nuclear force.
  • The electron is classified as a lepton and is a fundamental particle. It is held in its orbit by the electromagnetic force.
Show Worked Solution
  • The hydrogen atom is composed of one proton in the nucleus and one orbiting electron.
  • The proton is a hadron comprised of three quarks, two up quarks each with charge  `+(2)/(3)`  and one down quark with charge `-(1)/(3)`. These quarks are fundamental particles and are bound together by the strong nuclear force.
  • The electron is classified as a lepton and is a fundamental particle. It is held in its orbit by the electromagnetic force.

♦ Mean mark 55%.

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 4, Band 5, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

PHYSICS, M8 2021 HSC 3 MC

Which of the following is NOT a fundamental particle in the Standard Model of matter?

  1. Electron
  2. Gluon
  3. Muon
  4. Proton
Show Answers Only

`D`

Show Worked Solution
  • Protons are not fundamental particles (they are made up of quarks)

`=>D`

Filed Under: Deep Inside the Atom Tagged With: Band 4, smc-3704-10-Standard Model

Copyright © 2014–2025 SmarterEd.com.au · Log in