The Olympic gold medal-winning height for the women's high jump,
The table below lists the Olympic year,
A scatterplot of
When a least squares line is fitted to the scatterplot, the equation is found to be:
The correlation coefficient is 0.9318
- Name the response variable in this equation. (1 mark)
--- 1 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- Draw the least squares line on the scatterplot above. (1 mark)
--- 0 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- Determine the value of the coefficient of determination as a percentage. (1 mark)
- Round your answer to one decimal place.
--- 1 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- Describe the association between
and in terms of strength and direction. (1 mark)
--- 0 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- Referring to the equation of the least squares line, interpret the value of the slope in terms of the variables
and . (1 mark)
--- 3 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- In 1984, the
value was 2.07 m for a value of 2.02 m . - Show that when this least squares line is fitted to the scatterplot, the residual value for this point is 0.0328. (2 marks)
--- 4 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- The residual plot obtained when the least squares line was fitted to the data is shown below. The residual value from part f is missing from the residual plot.
-
- Complete the residual plot by adding the residual value from part f, drawn as a cross ( X ), to the residual plot above. (1 mark)
--- 0 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- In part b, a least squares line was fitted to the scatterplot. Does the residual plot from part g justify this? Briefly explain your answer. (1 mark)
--- 3 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---
- Complete the residual plot by adding the residual value from part f, drawn as a cross ( X ), to the residual plot above. (1 mark)
- In 1964, the gold medal-winning height,
, was 1.90m . When the least squares line is used to predict , it is found to be 1.934 m . - Explain why this prediction is not likely to be reliable. (1 mark)
--- 2 WORK AREA LINES (style=lined) ---